While drawing attention to Hollywood's continual omission of diversity from the Academy Awards was a good thing, The New York Times made a staggering error when they reported that Oscar statuettes have only been given "to a total of seven black actors," when in fact there have been 13 winners.
The most glaring oversight was the exclusion of Oscar winner Whoopi Goldberg, who won an Academy Award for Best Supporting Actress for her role in 'Ghost' in 1990.
The 55-year-old actress sounded off on the matter on her daytime talk show, 'The View,' where she expressed her disappointment with The New York Times feature.
"I am embarrassed to tell you that it hurt me terribly. When you win an Academy Award, that's part of what you've done, you're legacy. I will always be Academy Award winner Whoopi Goldberg and to have been dismissed and erased by the New York Times film critics who should know better, because not only am I an Academy Award win
ner," she said, before adding: "and just in case there's any damn question," and then pulled out her Oscar statuette.Goldberg continued: "I've made over 50 films and I've been nominated twice – once for 'The Color Purple' and once for 'Ghost' – and I won for 'Ghost.' I am told that I am part of the twelve who have what they call the EGOT, this is not hidden information. And to these two critics, who are the head critics of the New York Times, it's hard to not take it personally. You know, there's a lot of things people say and do, but this is sloppy journalism because this is not a hidden thing. Everybody kind of knows. People in Somalia know. People in China know. Because I'm – and I know it's kind of hard to believe – am a worldwide person who is known. Because there wasn't anyone like me and it was 50 years between Hattie McDaniel, the first Black woman to win, and me – 50!"
The EGOT that Goldberg referenced is the small group of individuals who have won the coveted Emmy, Grammy, Oscar and Tony Awards.
Goldberg, who in addition to her work in film has starred in several sitcoms, hosted a late night show and co-produced the game show 'Hollywood Squares,' said she doesn't have any solutions
for how The New York Times can fix their faux pas."I don't know what to say about what you've done. It's just nothing I can accept. You're sloppy in your work and you're supposed to be better than this. This is The New York Times; this isn't some bozo newspaper from hoochie coochie land. This is The New York Times and it hurt. We are fragile egos, all of us, every one of us. If you're going to talk about us – yeah, it's easy to take pot shots – but damnit, get your facts straight," she concluded.
A rep for the Times responded to Goldberg's rant on 'The View' in a statement to Entertainment Weekly.
"The error lies with those who are reading the story incorrectly," the statement reads. "The point of the piece was not to name every black actor or actress who has been awarded an Oscar, it was to draw a comparison between the number who won prior to 2002 (the year Halle Berry and Denzel Washington won) and those who have won since. And the story states very clearly that in 73 years, prior to 2002, only seven black actors/actresses won Oscars."
Related Articles
- Whoopi Goldberg Bringing 'Sister Act' Musical to Broadway
- Face-Off: Whoopi Goldberg Versus Bill O'Reilly Take 2
- White Washed: Shaun Robinson Disturbed By Vanity Fair's Blackout
- EXCLUSIVE: Oprah Winfrey Addresses Longtime Beef With Whoopi Goldberg During 'Color Purple' Reunion




Comments: (44)
Add a comment
By: girlking on 2/14/2011 1:36PM
Good for you Whoopie for calling them out. Too many times we just let things go.
Reply to this Comment | Report This
By: James on 2/15/2011 5:50AM
Whoopi wasn't snubbed, she just didn't understand what she was reading.
The entire point of the article was to compare the number of black Oscar-winners BEFORE 2002 to the number of winners AFTER 2002.
Lou Gossett and Cuba Gooding weren't named either, but you don't hear THEM whining...then again, maybe they (unlike Whoopie and, apparently, people posting here) know how to READ.
Report This
By: Shirley Redick on 2/14/2011 2:10PM
Not only did the snub hurt you Whoopie, it hurt me too. A proud, black, American woman.
Reply to this Comment | Report This
By: Jewel on 2/14/2011 1:43PM
Shelly, Whoopi corrected herself later and said it was actually 50 years, while Geoffrey Rush was being interviewed.
Reply to this Comment | Report This
By: Jann Flatinger on 2/14/2011 1:59PM
There's a head that should roll! As visible as Whoopie is, this is clearly a snub BUT why? This is like journalism 101--check your facts. Jawn Murray you NEED TO GO! We GET the NY TIMES at home in CA but I WON'T BE READING YOUR ARTICLES!!!!
Reply to this Comment | Report This
By: TV Gord on 2/14/2011 1:58PM
Well, I'm a white guy and it hurt me, too. It's bad enough that people of color are recognized so rarely that it makes headlines when it happens. To be this sloppy is inexcusable. The least the Times could do is print extensive profiles on the six actors who were left out of the original story.
Reply to this Comment | Report This
By: Tina on 2/14/2011 2:38PM
Thank God, we can speak up now days! We don't have to accept any old thing that is handed to us, that's not right.
Report This
By: Lindaatherbest on 2/14/2011 4:17PM
I watched "The View" this morning and, I, too, was deeply affected by the omission of Ms. Goldberg -- as well as the other Academy Award winning Black Americans who didn't receive mention -- in the NYT's article. Yet, the "Hollywood Oscar White-Out" message is still valid. Please keep this in mind. This is not a ubiquitous "get over it" moment. Make no mistake: it matters. And, there are 2 ways it can be fixed: 1) More Black Americans in green-light business decision-making positions; and, 2) More Black Americans keeping their "movie money" in their wallets until Hollywood gets a clue. Black Americans are NOT monolithic: there are as many diverse & universal storylines to tell as there are for any other people. Write, produce, direct, cast, distribute and promote them.
Report This
By: Rosita3597 on 2/15/2011 2:44PM
I think this was no error by the New York Times.
They knew it was 13 instead of 9. They did just what they intended to do exclude Whoopi. Eventually people will let you know just how they feel about you.
Reply to this Comment | Report This
By: westfall on 2/14/2011 5:37PM
I cosign with you Rosita. That's too much difference to have been a mistake. I feel they omitted purposefully, spitefully. An established well heeled newspaper like the NY Times just doesn't make this kind of mistake.
Report This