Fox News political contributor Dr. Marc Lamont Hill wants to put an end to the pop culture catchphrase "no homo."
"No homo" was originated by rap star Cam'ron, who had an affinity for wearing anything pink but didn't want it to be perceived as gay.
Since being made popular by Cam'ron and his Dipset hip-hop crew, the expression has evolved into a ubiquitous slang term used to chase any phrase, action or idea that could be perceived as gay.
The "no homo" phenomenon has even birthed a series of YouTube videos that spoof the term.
Now Hill, a television personality on Fox News and an associate professor of education at Teachers College in New York, is urging people to cease using the vernacular.
Read Hill's essay on why the use of "no homo" must end:
"Over the past few years, there has been a disturbing trend in hip-hop culture that has spilled into everyday urban life: the use the phrase 'no homo.' Essentially, a man will say 'no homo' to ensure that no one mistakes their remarks as homosexual in nature.
Still confused? Here are a few examples: I once appeared on New York's Hot 97 rad
io station with members of the Dipset rap crew. One of the members, Freeky Zeeky, was talking about an upcoming album and said, 'I couldn't have gotten it done if Cam'ron hadn't really gotten behind me. No homo!'
More recently, my brother and I were playing basketball with some young men in our neighborhood. One of the brothers, who was 6-foot-5 and cocky, demanded that we pass him the ball on every possession. Each time we had the ball, he would scream: 'Feed me! No homo... Give it to me! No homo. I want it! No homo.'
Last week, I stumbled into a bar during karaoke night. One of the men, who was apparently a regular, decided that he would depart from his normal catalog of disco covers. He grabbed the mic and said, 'Tonight, I want to try something different. No homo!'
In fact, there isn't a day that goes by that I don't hear someone utter this ridiculous phrase.
In some ways, 'no homo' is part of a long tradition of ghetto-language games that evince the quick wit and linguistic sophistication of black and brown people. I must admit that it took me a few seconds to understand what the brother was talking about during karaoke night. But once I did, I laughed uncontrollably at the childish absurdity of his decision to clarify that he wasn't planning a gay rendezvous. Still, despite its intellectual and comedic richness, the 'no homo' fad spotlights our troubling relationship with gay identities.
By punctuating even the most sexually nonsuggestive sen
tences with a homophobic disclaimer, we reinforce the idea that gay and lesbian people are worthy of ridicule, shame and surveillance.
This notion is particularly troubling within hip-hop culture, which is sustained by the creative work of gay stylists; writers; choreographers; and, yes, rappers.
The use of 'no homo' also reveals a deep homoerotic impulse within our culture. After all, how can you constantly say 'no homo' without constantly thinking about gay sex?
Perhaps, instead of finding new ways of deriding gay and lesbian people, we could devote that same energy to figuring out why we're obsessed with them. The answer may be deeper than we think. – Dr. Marc Lamont Hill
For more information on Hill, check out his Web site www.MarcLamontHill.com.
*****


Comments: (154)
Add a comment
By: Christi on 7/20/2009 9:57PM
I agree with you all the way! That was well said and you got your point across quite well. Myself, being a teenager, [not to say that other people aren't] I am frequently exposed to the saying "no-homo" and I also say it myself. Its only needed when something COULD be taken the wrong way and you want no confusion. I don't really see the issue with it. I've never heard a gay or lesbian or bisexual person complain about it, and even if they did, that probably wouldn't stop people from saying it anyways.
Report This
By: hillsamurai on 7/20/2009 8:12PM
I have reported you and you phony product to the Federal Trade Commission.
Reply to this Comment | Report This
By: Califields on 7/20/2009 8:18PM
I just watched the You Tube clip. How is that NOT hilarious??!
Reply to this Comment | Report This
By: Mike on 7/21/2009 9:24AM
Just makes me wonder why the guys who use this are THAT insecure in their sexuality that they constantly have to remind people that they are NOT gay.
If you're forever using phrases that need a disclaimer of "no homo", perhaps you need to look in the mirror and ask yourself "gee, maybe I'm really a homo?"
Report This
By: Earl on 7/20/2009 8:22PM
You have to be kidding me. I hear this phrase often. But now that I have read this article, I can see where this Fox News pundit is saying about this phrase.
The only thing I can agree with this man's statement is where "No homo" was used to ensure the comments are not taken as homosexual. Think about it this way. A guy talks to his buddy and they are having a good time. Then the guy says, "I love you man!" This statement alone would not be acceptable because it would mean that the guy is, should I say, gay. Given our views on homosexuality, the buddy would be disgusted. Now if the guy told his buddy, "I love you man. No homo!" then he is merely expressing to his buddy how much fun he had with him. That is how I have come to see this expression.
There are many uses for that phrased, but they are used in a immature manner. When used in an immature manner, the effect of "no homo" is instantly nullified. For example, a thug says to this wimp, "I wanna suck your balls, no homo." That is simply immature and uncalled for. Moreover, this shows us that the thug is homosexual.
Is that better understood?
Reply to this Comment | Report This
By: Shayna on 7/21/2009 12:40AM
Our society views on homosexuality is causing it. If our society did not have gay bashers there would be no need to have to clarify yourself, because everyone would understand that its ok if are or if you are not. And if you are close enough with a friend to say I love you, then that friend should understand that it is not meant in a sexual manner. It is ignorant, and it really shows how America mostly thinks about gay people, "its ok for you to be gay but no one I know and not me." We still have a long way to go before discrimination against all cultures will end. And yes homosexuality can be considered its own culture, just as the deaf have their own culture. And that is why gay marriage should be allowed, because marriage expresses love and commitment in all cultures and religions. You don't have to be christian to be married, you can be Hindu and it is still considered marriage. You get my point? So why can't gay people be married. Some gay people believe in god too and want to be married in His eyes, but are bot allowed to. Thanks for reading, please no hate comments, they are rediculus, hurtful, and immature. Simply express your opinion in a mature and respectful way.
Report This
By: demillicent on 7/22/2009 4:19PM
There's absolutely no need for people to clarify their statements constantly. To say to another man; I love you man needs no clarification. That phrase was used incessantly in the nineties because of the beer commercial.
We blacks just have a bad habit of using language that makes us look and sound immature. We try so hard to have our own language. I guess it's called Ebonics. That foolishness should stop. If we want to stand out.. why not use the Kings English effectively? That would make us sound intelligent and knowledgeable instead of illiterate.
Report This
By: Paulita on 7/20/2009 8:25PM
Hill No Mo. I have nothing against homosexuals or any other group. I just hate that the radicals have hurt the Boy Scouts, hurt the poverty stricken Church in Nigeria and call anyone that doesn't agree with them "homophobic." It's a little tiring and trite. Most of all, these things do their cause no good.
Reply to this Comment | Report This
By: Lisa on 7/27/2009 2:14AM
AMEN! I think if you decide to live out of the will of GOD then don't be offended if someone makes it clear their not interested in your choice. Is the person writing this article a down low brother. Because if you are not it would not bother you. It is important to let these people know you are not interested because they are agressive and will pursue straights as their bragging rights of turning people out. No Homo. No I am not homophobic
Report This
By: Dano17 on 7/20/2009 8:33PM
The hetrophobic gay community insists on broadcasting to the world their sexual preference yet when straight people broadcast their preference it is a bad thing? Give me a break. Maybe if homosexuals didn't make such a big public deal out of their orientation their orientation would not be a big deal.
Reply to this Comment | Report This